A jury has ruled in favor of Energy Transfer in a lawsuit against environmental organization Greenpeace, ordering the group to pay significant damages. The lawsuit, filed in relation to protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, alleged that Greenpeace engaged in racketeering and defamation.

According to court documents, Energy Transfer claimed that Greenpeace spread false information about the pipeline and used illegal tactics to oppose its construction. The jury determined that Greenpeace's actions caused harm to the company's reputation and financial well-being.

This verdict marks a significant legal blow to Greenpeace, which has long been known for its environmental activism. The organization has faced criticism in the past for its aggressive tactics, and this ruling may have far-reaching implications for other activist groups.

Greenpeace has vowed to appeal the decision, stating that they will continue to fight for environmental justice. However, the outcome of this lawsuit serves as a cautionary tale for advocacy organizations, highlighting the potential consequences of spreading misinformation and engaging in unlawful behavior.