**Article:**

In a bold move that has ignited fierce national debate, former President Donald Trump has reignited discussions around birthright citizenship, proposing that children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents should not automatically receive citizenship. The push comes in the wake of nearly two dozen states filing a suit against the Trump administration, claiming such a measure would violate constitutional rights and further complicate immigration matters.

Advocates for the policy argue that the current birthright system incentivizes illegal immigration and places undue strain on public resources. Trump’s supporters contend that restricting citizenship could lead to a more orderly immigration process. “By addressing this issue, we’re prioritizing American citizens over those who enter the country unlawfully,” Trump stated during a recent rally.

Opponents, including civil liberties groups and various state officials, argue that birthright citizenship is enshrined in the 14th Amendment, asserting that such a drastic change could undermine the foundational principles of equality and justice. This legal battle is not just about citizenship; it reflects deeper national divisions over immigration policy.

As states prepare to challenge Trump’s latest directive in court, the implications of this dispute extend beyond legal frameworks, touching the lives of millions and posing critical questions about identity, belonging, and the American dream. Observers warn that the outcome could reshape the landscape of U.S. citizenship for generations to come.