President Trump’s decision to freeze aid could hit Sudan and lead to further suffering for starving children, experts warn. The cuts to international aid, including USAID programs, are part of the administration’s efforts to refocus on domestic priorities and reduce spending overseas.

While some experts argue that cutting foreign aid could benefit the U.S. in negotiations with countries like Iran, others highlight the humanitarian impact of these decisions. USAID programs have been crucial in providing food, healthcare, and education to vulnerable populations around the world.

Congressman David Lammy has raised concerns about the implications of Trump’s cuts, pointing out that China could step in to fill the void left by the U.S. withdrawal from international aid efforts. This could have long-term consequences for U.S. influence and relationships with countries in need.

As negotiations with Iran continue, the impact of Trump’s aid cuts on global stability and humanitarian efforts remains to be seen. Critics argue that the short-term gains in negotiations may come at a high cost to vulnerable populations worldwide.