Federal Appeals Court Upholds $83.3M Judgment Against Trump in E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case

In a major blow to former President Donald Trump, a federal appeals court has upheld an $83.3 million judgment against him in the defamation case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll. Carroll had accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in the 1990s, a claim he denied and called her a liar in response.

The latest ruling from the appeals court affirmed a lower court’s decision in favor of Carroll, who sued Trump for defamation after he publicly discredited her accusations. The court found that Trump’s remarks had damaged Carroll’s reputation and caused her emotional distress, warranting the substantial judgment.

Despite Trump’s repeated appeals to dismiss the case, the court’s decision stands as a significant legal defeat for the former president. The judgment not only highlights the repercussions of Trump’s controversial statements but also serves as a victory for survivors of sexual assault seeking justice.

The ruling is seen as another legal setback for Trump, who faces multiple legal challenges and investigations as he continues to be embroiled in numerous scandals and controversies.

Category: Politics

Published on: 2025-09-08 16:54:24

Tags: appeals court upholds judgment trump

Appeals Court Halts Judge's Order to Release Alligators from Alcatraz

A federal appeals court has ruled in favor of keeping alligators at the infamous Alcatraz prison, overturning a lower court's decision to release the reptiles into the wild. The ruling comes after a contentious legal battle between animal rights activists and wildlife officials over the fate of the alligators on the iconic island.

The Judge’s order to remove the alligators from Alcatraz was met with fierce opposition from the Department of Fish and Wildlife, who argued that the reptiles were an important part of the ecosystem on the island. Wildlife officials also cited concerns about the safety of releasing the alligators into the surrounding waters, where they could pose a threat to local wildlife and potentially harm humans.

Operations on the island were temporarily halted pending the appeals court decision, but have now resumed following the ruling in favor of keeping the alligators at Alcatraz. The decision has been met with mixed reactions, with animal rights activists expressing disappointment while wildlife officials and conservationists are relieved.

For now, the alligators will remain on Alcatraz, continuing to be a unique and controversial feature of the former prison turned national park.

Category: U.S.

Published on: 2025-09-05 06:24:24

Tags: alcatraz appeals court

Appeals Court Rules on Alligator Alcatraz Controversy in Florida

In a landmark decision, the appeals court in Florida has made a ruling on the controversial issue of alligators at Alcatraz detention center. The court has ordered the removal of the alligators from the facility, siding with immigrant rights groups who have been fighting against the presence of these dangerous creatures.

The saga began when the Trump administration decided to relocate alligators from the swamps of Florida to Alcatraz as a deterrent for detainees attempting to escape. The move was met with widespread backlash and legal challenges, culminating in the recent ruling by the appeals court.

Immigration activists have long argued that the presence of alligators at the detention center is inhumane and violates the rights of the detainees. The recent court decision is being hailed as a victory for human rights and a step towards more compassionate immigration policies.

As the alligators are set to be removed from Alcatraz, the future of the facility remains uncertain. Immigrant rights groups are hopeful that this ruling will set a precedent for more humane treatment of detainees in the future.

Category: U.S.

Published on: 2025-09-04 21:03:27

Tags: appeals court alcatraz

Federal Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Trump Administration in Key Legal Battles

In a series of significant legal victories for the Trump administration, federal appeals courts have ruled in favor of the government in key cases involving climate policy, foreign policy, and regulatory enforcement.

In a decision that could have far-reaching implications for environmental regulations, a federal appeals court lifted a block on the Trump administration's termination of $1.6 billion in grant funds related to climate change. The ruling is a major win for the administration's efforts to roll back Obama-era environmental initiatives.

In another closely watched case, a federal appeals court upheld the administration's interpretation of the Alien Enemies Act in relation to Venezuela. The court rejected arguments that the government's actions constituted a violation of due process rights, affirming the president's authority to determine threats to national security.

Meanwhile, there is growing scrutiny on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) as Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter has taken aim at the Trump administration's approach to consumer protection. Slaughter's outspoken criticism has sparked debate within the agency and drawn attention to the role of independent regulatory bodies in the current political climate.

Category: Politics

Published on: 2025-09-03 06:00:26

Tags: appeals court trump

Appeals Court Allows Controversial Decisions to Move Forward

In a series of controversial rulings, appeals courts across the country have made decisions that will have lasting impacts on various aspects of society.

One appeals court has allowed the enforcement of Arkansas's ban on gender transition care for minors, making it the first in the nation to do so. This decision has sparked debate on the rights of transgender youth and parental authority over their medical decisions.

Another court has ruled in favor of former President Trump's policy to withhold foreign aid from countries that do not align with U.S. interests. This decision could potentially strain diplomatic relations and has raised questions about the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches.

In a separate case, an appeals court has granted permission for the release of data related to the popular cryptocurrency Dogecoin. This decision could have far-reaching implications for the financial sector and the regulation of digital currencies.

These decisions highlight the power of appeals courts in shaping laws and policies, and the ongoing battles over fundamental rights and government authority.

Category: Politics

Published on: 2025-08-13 19:48:22

Tags: appeals court allows

US Appeals Courts Weigh in on Contempt Orders Against Trump Administration

Two separate appeals courts have recently ruled on contempt orders handed down to the Trump administration, sparking debate and concern over the limits of executive power and judicial oversight.

In the case of Venezuelan and Salvadoran migrants facing deportation, a US appeals court sided with the administration in overturning a contempt order issued by a lower court. The original order had accused the administration of defying a previous ruling halting the deportations. The appeals court ruled that the lower court had overstepped its bounds and lacked the authority to hold the administration in contempt.

On a separate front, a different appeals court blocked contempt proceedings against the Trump administration stemming from its deportation flights to countries in Latin America. The proceedings had been initiated by a federal judge who accused the administration of ignoring court orders and acting in contempt of court. The appeals court decision raises questions about the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches.

These cases highlight the complex legal landscape surrounding immigration enforcement and the boundaries of executive authority in the realm of deportation policy.

Category: Politics

Published on: 2025-08-08 16:30:25

Tags: appeals court contempt

Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Trump's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order

A federal appeals court has ruled against former President Donald Trump's executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship, a longstanding principle in the United States. The ruling, handed down by the court on Monday, declared the order unconstitutional, sparking debates among various legal experts regarding the limits of executive power.

In a separate appeal case, MyPillow founder Mike Lindell has challenged the results of the 2024 elections, alleging widespread fraud and vowing to overturn the current administration's victory. This high-stakes battle in the court system has captured the attention of the nation, with both supporters and critics closely following the proceedings.

Meanwhile, in California, a new ruling has upheld the state's background checks for ammunition purchases, a measure aimed at reducing gun violence. The decision comes as a relief to gun control advocates and marks a victory in the ongoing national debate over Second Amendment rights versus public safety.

These recent court rulings highlight the crucial role of the judiciary in interpreting and upholding the law, shaping the future of key policy issues in the United States.

Category: Politics

Published on: 2025-07-24 18:21:25

Tags: appeals court rules

Appeals Court Restores Hold on Trump Administration's Plan to Cut Government Agency by 90%

An appeals court has ruled in favor of restoring a hold on the Trump administration's plan to cut a government agency by 90%. The decision comes after President Trump blocked federal funding for news outlets, including Voice of America (VOA), in an effort to overhaul the agency.

In a huge victory for President Trump, the appeals court backed the VOA overhaul, which includes plans by Kari Lake to modernize the agency. This decision validates the administration's efforts to reshape the government agency in line with the president's vision.

The court's ruling marks a significant setback for critics of the administration's plans to slash funding and restructure the agency. The decision to restore the hold on the Trump administration's proposed cuts will allow the agency to continue operating at its current capacity.

As the legal battle over the agency's future continues, the outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the government and for the media landscape. President Trump's efforts to reshape federal news outlets like VOA remain a controversial issue, with supporters and detractors closely watching the developments in court.

Category: Politics

Published on: 2025-05-04 09:09:24

Tags: appeals court trump

Appeals Court Ruling Upholds Trump's Authority on Workforce Protection Boards

In a significant victory for the Trump administration, an appeals court has ruled in favor of President Trump's power to make decisions regarding labor and workforce protection boards. The ruling comes after a series of legal battles surrounding the dismissal of board leaders appointed by the previous administration.

The court's decision to grant a temporary stay on Trump's firings of board leaders has been met with backlash from critics who argue that his actions are politically motivated. However, supporters of the president applaud the ruling, citing his authority to appoint individuals who align with his policies.

In a separate ruling, the appeals court has also given the green light for the controversial organization, DOGE, to continue operating under the supervision of USAID. This marks another victory for the Trump administration, as they continue to push for reforms in various government agencies.

As Trump's firing appeals continue to make headlines, the legal battle over his authority in the realm of workforce protection boards is far from over. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.

Category: Politics

Published on: 2025-03-29 21:56:43

Tags: appeals court trump

Appeals Court Blocks Trump Administration's Deportation Flights

An appeals court has ruled against the Trump administration's plans to deport refugees under the Alien Enemies Act, citing violations of immigration laws. The decision comes after a series of legal battles over the controversial deportation flights, with critics alleging that the administration's actions were inhumane and unconstitutional.

The court's ruling is a major blow to the Trump administration's hardline immigration policies, which have faced widespread criticism for their treatment of refugees and asylum seekers. The decision to block the deportation flights has been hailed as a victory for advocates of immigrants' rights, who have long argued that the administration's actions were unjust and discriminatory.

In response to the court's decision, the Trump administration has vowed to appeal the ruling, maintaining their stance that the deportations are necessary to protect national security. However, with the legal battle far from over, the fate of the refugees remains uncertain as they continue to seek asylum in the United States.

The case is expected to have far-reaching implications for the future of immigration policy in the country, as the courts grapple with the balance between national security and human rights.

Category: Politics

Published on: 2025-03-27 04:05:35

Tags: appeals court trump